← Back to the set

Track 06 / 08 · 2025

PeerPods

Product Definition · User Research · MSc AI

An AI-powered music community product, taken from user needs to an evaluated prototype.

Role
IUI Designer · UX Researcher · Prototype Designer
Tools
Figma · X (social listening) · Think-aloud protocol
Module
KV7005 Intelligent User Interfaces · MSc AI · 2025
PeerPods, title slide

The story

A context-aware product for music reflection and community. I found user needs through social listening on X, benchmarked 6 competing platforms, and built 3 personas and a requirements traceability map.

From there I took it from lo-fi wireframes to a hi-fi Figma prototype, tested in think-aloud sessions with 3 participants.

The AI features include adaptive writing prompts, context-aware feed re-weighting, an onboarding-driven recommender, and personalisation signals the user controls.

3 personas · 6 platforms benchmarked

Liner notes

Step by step

  1. PeerPods: PeerPods
    01

    PeerPods

    A context-aware intelligent user interface for music reflection and community, designed as a calm companion layer alongside existing music platforms for writing, discovery and peer connection.

  2. PeerPods: Problem statement
    02

    Problem statement

    Music reflection is already happening on Substack, Reddit, X and Medium, but scattered across platforms not built for it. Six public X posts surfaced four recurring needs: structured listening, long-form review spaces, contextual playlist sharing and like-minded community.

  3. PeerPods: What is PeerPods?
    03

    What is PeerPods?

    Reflective writing with adaptive prompts, guided listening parties and clubs, playlist sharing with context, and onboarding-driven recommendations with visible, adjustable signals.

  4. PeerPods: Intelligence
    04

    Intelligence

    Four intelligent behaviours: adaptive writing prompts that evolve with the draft and listening history; content visibility that adapts to release cycles and reading behaviour; a recommender with explicit onboarding signals; and user control as a first-class feature, with every toggle visible.

  5. PeerPods: Research approach
    05

    Research approach

    Three strands: social listening on X (6 posts coded), competitive analysis across 6 platforms (Letterboxd, Medium, Substack, Reddit, Spotify, SoundCloud), and synthesis into 3 personas.

  6. PeerPods: Persona 1: Amara Johnson
    06

    Persona 1: Amara Johnson

    Amara, 23, is a Creative Arts student in London. She listens daily and sometimes writes about music, but finds apps overwhelming. She needs a dedicated space for reflections, context-aware prompts and interest-based communities she controls.

  7. PeerPods: Persona 2: Daniel Ekong
    07

    Persona 2: Daniel Ekong

    Daniel, 25, works in technical support in Port Harcourt. He shares playlists actively, but his posts get lost in fast-moving feeds. He needs playlist sharing with context and messaging built into the music discussion.

  8. PeerPods: Persona 3: Munachi Umeh
    08

    Persona 3: Munachi Umeh

    Munachi, 35, is a Product Designer in Lagos. She listens 5+ hours a day and is highly aware of AI behaviour. She wants transparent, diverse recommendations beyond mainstream trends, and control over personalisation before she trusts it.

  9. PeerPods: Requirements
    09

    Requirements

    Every functional requirement traces to a user statement: F1 structured reflections, F2 context-aware writing prompts, F3 listening parties, F4 music clubs, F5 playlist sharing with context, F6 onboarding-driven For You with opt-out. No feature without evidence.

  10. PeerPods: Primary scenario: Amara
    10

    Primary scenario: Amara

    Amara plays a track on Spotify. PeerPods detects it and offers a dismissable prompt, "Pod your thought?" She taps Write now, the song attaches, she drafts a paragraph, and Smart Prompts appear, grounded in her draft. She posts to her fan club.

  11. PeerPods: Lo-fi wireframes
    11

    Lo-fi wireframes

    Listening detection triggers a gentle notification; tapping opens compose with the track attached; Smart Prompts appear after the first paragraph with an on/off toggle; the finished pod lands in the For You feed.

  12. PeerPods: Breadth scenarios
    12

    Breadth scenarios

    Daniel's feed re-weights as a Tyler, the Creator drop approaches and 14 members join a synced Listen Together session. Munachi long-presses a mainstream rec, asks for more underground, adjusts her feed sliders, and the feed re-reasons immediately.

  13. PeerPods: Information architecture
    13

    Information architecture

    Five top-level sections: Home (For You / Following), Community, Listening Parties (Live / Upcoming), Compose (Reflection / Playlist / Tracks) and Profile (Settings / Opt-outs).

  14. PeerPods: Hi-fi prototype
    14

    Hi-fi prototype

    Five high-fidelity Figma screens: Home with Smart Prompts drawer, Compose with adaptive prompts, a Listening Party with synced playback and chat, Community discovery, and the Personalisation settings panel.

  15. PeerPods: The intelligence, made visible
    15

    The intelligence, made visible

    Track auto-attached when listening is detected; Smart Prompts after the first paragraph with a toggle; a global off switch; signal sliders showing what shapes the feed; "Not for me" with reason capture; and live feed re-reasoning.

  16. PeerPods: Evaluation: think-aloud
    16

    Evaluation: think-aloud

    Think-aloud sessions over Teams with 3 participants mapped to the personas. Six tasks: onboarding, writing a reflection, joining a community, hosting a listening party, dismissing a rec and adjusting feed signals.

  17. PeerPods: Findings
    17

    Findings

    Smart Prompts were moved to after the first paragraph ("why is it interrupting me before I've even started?"), a long-press hint was added, and the listening-party invite went from 3 steps to 1. The personalisation panel earned trust.

  18. PeerPods: Reflection
    18

    Reflection

    Strong on context recognition, scaffolded writing and transparent control. Weak on cold-start recommendations in week 1, and writing-first excludes voice or photo reflectors. Three participants can't measure long-term engagement. Traceability forced every feature to be evidence-backed.